Autonomous vehicles
Dare more, risk less
« The level of safety to be ensured by automated/autonomous vehicles shall be at least equal to the one ensured by a competent and careful human driver. »
UNECE, WP.29/GRVA/2020/32 – “Revised Framework Document on Automated/Autonomous Vehicles”
Today
Regulation
Homologation and certification are crucial, but not sufficient to demonstrate the security of the autonomous vehicle trajectories.
Various criteria
A lot of security criteria exist to evaluate autonomous vehicle trajectories. There is a lack of a unique, explicable, physical criterion.
Massive simulation
Statistics over massive simulation is a costly answer. Problematic scenarios have still to be deeply analysed with the other criteria.
A detailed and explainable analysis without massive computing
A configurable software to test different hypotheses
Going beyond regulations, with a physical analysis
Dare more, risk less
Our Solution
takes into account the maneuverability capabilities of obstacles and the ego vehicle to provide the following information: “You may not be able to avoid a collision at less than X km/h within T seconds.”
Our offers
PoCs
Get the opportunity to adapt our solution to your needs.
Services
Mobpti solution is based on the Mobpti library. With its Python API, this library can be used in risk analysis official or custom methods.
