Skip to Content

Ships

Dare more, risk less

30% of casualties and incidents occurred with ships are

collision or contacts

Today

CPA, TCPA / BCR, BCT

The actual criteria for collision risk estimation make the hypothesis that nobody involved in the risk will change their minds, and so has to be checked regurarly

Exclusion zones

around ships vary with a lot of parameters (relative velocity, visibility, maneuverability), but are empiric and don't reflect the complexity of a dense zone

NRML, ARML, NDRM

The actual computing methods for collision avoidance routes don't take into account capabilities of obstacles and make it difficult to deal with multiple obstacles

Obstacles motion are uncertain 

Because we don't know their intentions and ability, we must consider that their maneuver capabilities are adversarial

 Ships have maneuver capabilities

That has a positive influence on the risk, if they are well taken into account, even more for large ships

deep risk analysis 
detailed and explainable analysis without massive computing
parametrable software



configurable software to test different hypotheses

beyond regulation deep analysis



A physical analysis that lead to reliable  information

  mobpti logoDare more, risk less

Our Solution

takes into account the maneuverability capabilities of obstacles and the ego vehicle to provide the following information: “You may not be able to avoid a collision at less than X knots within T seconds.”